Published September 30, 2024 | Version 1.0
Project deliverable Open

Landscape Overview of Persistent Identifiers for Research Data Repositories

Creators

  • 1. DataCite

Contributors

Data curator:

Related person:

  • 1. ROR icon Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
  • 2. DataCite
  • 3. Helmholtz Open Science Office
  • 4. ROR icon Purdue University West Lafayette
  • 5. Humboldt University of Berlin

Description

Persistent identifiers (PIDs) play a crucial role in ensuring the long-term accessibility, discoverability, and citation of research data. As the volume and diversity of research data repositories continue to grow, the discussion around a standardized PID for Research Data Repositories (RDRs) continues. This paper provides an overview of specific examples of PIDs for RDRs, outlining their characteristics followed by a discussion of what a PID for RDRs should be referencing.

Files

Landscape Overview of Persistent Identifiers for Research Data Repositories (final).pdf

Files (258.4 kB)

Additional details

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
re3data – Offene und nutzerorientierte Referenz für Forschungsdatenrepositorien (re3data COREF) 422587133

References

  • Baglioni, M., Mannocci, A., Pavone, G., De Bonis, M., & Manghi, P. (2023). (Semi)automated disambiguation of scholarly repositories. Proceedings of the 19th The Conference on Information and Research Science Connecting to Digital and Library Science, 47–59. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3365/paper2.pdf
  • French, A. (2022). Emerging uses of the Research Organization Registry. In Septentrio Conference Series (Issue 1). UiT The Arctic University of Norway. https://doi.org/10.7557/5.6654
  • Gaudet, P., Bairoch, A., Field, D., Sansone, S.-A., Taylor, C., Attwood, T. K., Bateman, A., Blake, J. A., Bult, C. J., Cherry, J. M., Chisholm, R. L., Cochrane, G., Cook, C. E., Eppig, J. T., Galperin, M. Y., Gentleman, R., Goble, C. A., Gojobori, T., … Hancock, J. M. (2011). Towards BioDBcore: a community-defined information specification for biological databases. In Database (Vol. 2011, Issue 0, pp. baq027–baq027). Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baq027
  • Pampel, H., Weisweiler, N. L., Strecker, D., Witt, M., Vierkant, P., Elger, K., Bertelmann, R., Buys, M., Ferguson, L. M., Kindling, M., Kotarski, R., & Petras, V. (2023). re3data – Indexing the Global Research Data Repository Landscape Since 2012. In Scientific Data (Vol. 10, Issue 1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02462-y
  • Sansone, SA., McQuilton, P., Rocca-Serra, P. et al. FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. Nat Biotechnol 37, 358–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0080-8
  • Strecker, D., Axtmann, A., Bertelmann, R., Cousijn, H., Elger, K., Ferguson, L. M., Fichtmüller, D., Jones, C., Lindenmann, I., Neidiger, C., Nguyen, T. B., Pal, J. K., Pampel, H., Petras, V., Schnepf, E., Semrau, A., Ulrich, R., Upmeier, A., Vierkant, P., … Wright, S. J. (2023). Metadata Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories : version 4.0. Re3data. https://doi.org/10.48440/RE3.014
  • Strecker, D., Pampel, H., Schabinger, R., & Weisweiler, N. L. (2023). Disappearing repositories: Taking an infrastructure perspective on the long-term availability of research data. In Quantitative Science Studies (Vol. 4, Issue 4, pp. 839–856). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00277
  • Wani, J. A., Sofi, T. A., Sofi, I. A., & Ganaie, S. A. (2023). The status of open access repositories in the field of technology: insights from OpenDOAR. In Information Discovery and Delivery (Vol. 52, Issue 2, pp. 164–174). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/idd-11-2022-0119
  • Vierkant, P., Bertelmann, R., Cousijn, H., Elger, K., Ferguson, L. M., Goebelbecker, H.-J., Kindling, M., Kloska, G., Nguyen Thanh, B., Pampel, H., Petras, V., Schabinger, R., Schnepf, E., Semrau, A., Strecker, D., Trofimenko, M., Ulrich, R., Upmeier, A., Weisweiler, N. L., … Witt, M. (2021). re3data Conceptual Model for User Stories. Re3data. https://doi.org/10.48440/RE3.012
  • Weisweiler, N. L., Bertelmann, R., Cousijn, H., Elger, K., Ferguson, L. M., Goebelbecker, H.-J., Kindling, M., Kloska, G., Nguyen Thanh, B., Pampel, H., Petras, V., Schabinger, R., Schnepf, E., Semrau, A., Strecker, D., Trofimenko, M., Ulrich, R., Upmeier, A., Vierkant, P., … Witt, M. (2021). re3data Stakeholder Survey and Workshop Report. re3data. https://doi.org/10.48440/RE3.013